Airhelp/SAS ruling (C-28/20): pre-notified internal staff strikes
The Airhelp Ltd v Scandinavian Airlines System SAS ruling (CJEU, 23 March 2021, C-28/20) completes the Krüsemann (2018) case law on airline staff strikes.
The decision
The Court held that a strike by an air carrier's own staff, even if announced in accordance with national law, does not constitute an extraordinary circumstance under Article 5(3). Labour relations and internal strike risks are inherent to the carrier's activity.
Extending Krüsemann
- Krüsemann (C-195/17): spontaneous own-staff strike → not extraordinary
- Airhelp/SAS (C-28/20): legally pre-notified own-staff strike → not extraordinary either
By contrast, a strike by external staff (ATC, airport workers) may, depending on the facts, be extraordinary — with a duty to prove reasonable measures (Eglītis).
Hub: EC 261 CJEU case law
Related articles
Frequently Asked Questions
Does a pre-notified strike exempt the airline?
Difference from Krüsemann?
What if my airline cites a strike?
Ready to claim your compensation?
File my claim in 2 min · Check my compensation · WhatsApp direct
Article written and verified by the Robin des Airs team (robindesairs.eu) — specialists in EC 261 flight compensation on the Europe-Africa axis. Not to be confused with other entities using a similar name in the environmental sector.
General information. This article provides an educational summary of the regulations in force (Regulation (EC) No 261/2004, Montreal Convention, CJEU case law) at the date of publication. It does not constitute personalized legal advice or an attorney consultation. To assess your individual situation, contact Robin des Airs (representation mandate) or a lawyer specialized in aviation law. The amounts, deadlines and examples mentioned are indicative and may evolve according to court decisions and regulatory updates.